[Users] Did anyone have any issue with some balancer in front of Zimbra?

[Fabio S. Schmidt]

Greetings Brando, 

Thank you for your reply. I've submitted to Zimbra an RFE to support the origin IP with this format. 

Best regards. 

Atenciosamente, 
Fabio S. Schmidt 

Diretor técnico 

E-mail: fabio at bktech.com.br 
www.bktech.com.br 
Tel.: +55 (61) 3226-7932 

Cel.: +55 (61) 99116-3941 


De: "Brando Beaumont" <branzo at itaserv.net> 
Para: "Fabio Schmidt" <fabio at bktech.com.br> 
Cc: "users" <users at lists.zetalliance.org> 
Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 27 de maio de 2019 5:28:54 
Assunto: Re: [Users] Did anyone have any issue with some balancer in front of Zimbra? 

Good morning Fabio, 

as stated here [1], X-Forwaded-For can pass multiple IPs. Including the IP of the Netscaler should add another IP to the list.. 

cya, 
Brando B. 

[1] - [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Forwarded-For | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Forwarded-For ] 




Da: "Fabio S. Schmidt" <fabio at bktech.com.br> 
A: "users" <users at lists.zetalliance.org> 
Inviato: Venerdì, 24 maggio 2019 15:25:13 
Oggetto: [Users] Did anyone have any issue with some balancer in front of Zimbra? 




BQ_BEGIN

Hello guys, 

Our customers always use a balancer in front of Zimbra to balance the load and implement H.A. at least for the proxy servers. 

A particular customer use Netscaler and we have noticed that it is displaying both the IPs (client and the balancer) on our logs: 

;mid=231 ;oip=10.32.90.33, 172.16.5.1 

These logs are being displayed on zmmailboxd.out: 

Ignoring malformed remote address 10.32.90.33, 172.16.5.1 

Maybe should we include the Netscaler IP on the Zimbra trusted IP parameter? 

Best regards. 
Fabio S. Schmidt 

BQ_END


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zetalliance.org/pipermail/users_lists.zetalliance.org/attachments/20190527/5adddaa6/attachment.html>