[Users] Did anyone have any issue with some balancer in front of Zimbra?

[Brando Beaumont]

Good morning Fabio, 

as stated here [1], X-Forwaded-For can pass multiple IPs. Including the IP of the Netscaler should add another IP to the list.. 

cya, 
Brando B. 

[1] - [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Forwarded-For | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Forwarded-For ] 

> Da: "Fabio S. Schmidt" <fabio at bktech.com.br>
> A: "users" <users at lists.zetalliance.org>
> Inviato: Venerdì, 24 maggio 2019 15:25:13
> Oggetto: [Users] Did anyone have any issue with some balancer in front of
> Zimbra?

> Hello guys,

> Our customers always use a balancer in front of Zimbra to balance the load and
> implement H.A. at least for the proxy servers.

> A particular customer use Netscaler and we have noticed that it is displaying
> both the IPs (client and the balancer) on our logs:

> ;mid=231 ;oip=10.32.90.33, 172.16.5.1

> These logs are being displayed on zmmailboxd.out:

> Ignoring malformed remote address 10.32.90.33, 172.16.5.1

> Maybe should we include the Netscaler IP on the Zimbra trusted IP parameter?

> Best regards.
> Fabio S. Schmidt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zetalliance.org/pipermail/users_lists.zetalliance.org/attachments/20190527/675b2ae4/attachment.html>