[Users] Need volunteer to deal with issues reported in Zimbra Docker

Fri Oct 13 15:32:59 CEST 2017

Howdy guys, 

sorry for being late but i had a few things to look at that consumed all my spare time. 

I've been updated by Cine about the call you had on tuesday, but if you would like to loop in other ppl, please do. 

I'll play a bit with Zimbra-Community/zimbra-docker tomorrow or sunday. 

Thanks, 
Brando 

From: "L. Mark Stone" <lmark.stone at reliablenetworks.com> 
To: users at lists.zetalliance.org 
Cc: "Brando Beaumont" <branzo at itaserv.net>, "Barry de Graaff" <info at barrydegraaff.tk> 
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:20:49 PM 
Subject: Re: [Users] Need volunteer to deal with issues reported in Zimbra Docker 

BQ_BEGIN

Gents, 

Last week Reliable Networks had a brief intro call with F9 Teams, who are leading the Zimbra HA project, supervised by Michael Medellin within Synacor. (We are one of the Zimbra Partners who volunteered at Commit to help with the HA project.) 

As was disclosed at Commit last month, F9 Teams' work will rely on Docker and Kubernetes. 

I'd suggest looping Michael Medellin in to get his/Synacor's views on organizing Docker repositories. With Michael's input hopefully we can avoid duplication of effort but also help each other if multiple Docker repos are called for on a longer-term basis. 

Please Note: I am not a Docker expert by any means, so I have no views on how this should be organized -- I'm only suggesting looping in Michael Medellin. 

With best regards to all, 
Mark 
___________________________________________________________ 
A Message From... L. Mark Stone, General Manager 

"Uptime. All the time." ® [ http://www.reliablenetworks.com/ | www.reliablenetworks.com ] 

Fifteen Years In Business! 2003 - 2017! 

477 Congress Street, Suite 812 | Portland, ME 04101 | ( [ callto:+1207%29%20772-5678 | 207) 772-5678 ] 
Citrix XenApp/XenDesktop Hosting | SOC 2 Type II Audit 
Zimbra Groupware | Mission-Critical Cl oud Hosting 

This email may contain information that is privileged and confidential. 
If you suspect that you were not intended to receive it, please delete 
it and notify us as soon as possible. Thank you. 

BQ_BEGIN
From: "Barry de Graaff" <info at barrydegraaff.tk> 
To: "Brando Beaumont" <branzo at itaserv.net> 
Cc: users at lists.zetalliance.org 
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02:48 AM 
Subject: Re: [Users] Need volunteer to deal with issues reported in Zimbra Docker 

BQ_END

BQ_BEGIN
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
Hash: SHA256 

Hello Brando, 

I would like to comment on a few things you and Marc replied 
on the in the past few days. 

While there are a number of other (upstream) repositories, and 
I understand the point of not duplicating efforts, I would like 
to point out that an open-source community is also about helping 
people out. 

This is what we are trying to do at 
https://github.com/Zimbra-Community/zimbra-docker 

A lot of people come there (because they did not find the other 
repos). 

Also the Zeta Alliance repo, allows for adding Github Issues, and as 
far as I know Zimbra upstream repos does not. Also the status 
of the upstream repo is not clear to me, nor the purpose of them. 

What I would like, is someone to take a look at Zimbra-Community/zimbra-docker 
see if it still works, if not, either fix it, or upload a better version 
and deal with the occasional issue reported. 

So we *help* the people looking there. 

I am looking for someone now, because I do not want issues left unreplied 
in limbo. 

Hope this clarifies things. Thanks. 

Kind regards, 

Barry de Graaff 
Zeta Alliance Founder 
zetalliance.org | github.com/Zimbra-Community 

+31 617 220 227 
Fingerprint: 97f4694a1d9aedad012533db725ddd156d36a2d0 

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brando Beaumont" <branzo at itaserv.net> 
To: users at lists.zetalliance.org 
Sent: Saturday, 7 October, 2017 16:26:40 
Subject: Re: [Users] Need volunteer to deal with issues reported in Zimbra Docker 

Hello Marc, 

- ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Marc Gadsdon" <mg at in-tuition.net> 
> To: users at lists.zetalliance.org 
> Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2017 1:02:08 PM 
> Subject: Re: [Users] Need volunteer to deal with issues reported in Zimbra Docker 

> My thoughts below: 
> 
>> 
>>> Would you be willing to manage https://github.com/Zimbra-Community/zimbra-docker 
>>> You could publish your docker work, or update this one and then deal 
>>> with the occasional Github issue? 
>>> 
>> 
>> As you may have seen i gave a reply to a few issues but i think it would be 
>> better to think, all of us who is interested, about the target we would like to 
>> reach with this repo? 
>> 
>> Do we want to give the users the opportunity to bring up (in a relatively timely 
>> manner) a Zimbra Server (or a multiserver env) or just the possibility to fork? 
>> How many env do we want to support (i've read things on openSuSe) ? 
> 
> Given the work Zimbra and F9 are doing for Zimbra 9 (or whatever it's called), 
> could it be a duplication of effort to work on this when it's highly likely 
> that F9/Zimbra will release a similar solution fairly soon? Maybe there are 
> advantages to a community based solution? 

There is no easy answer to this, i guess That's why i asked for comments from others. 

If by citing Zimbra/F9 are you referring to this repo: https://github.com/Zimbra/zm-docker? 

On the other hand, i've also seen https://github.com/Zimbra/docker-zcs-foss but it looks like something that was 
started recently, so not so much things, in terms of issues, came up yet. 

Thanks, 
Brando B. 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
Version: OpenPGP.js v2.5.4 
Comment: http://openpgpjs.org 

wkYEAREIABAFAlnbj5cJEHJd3RVtNqLQAADAYgCfabPPl92P1O3eWOvj3lt0 
0Kbyd8QAnjWzubASXp1qmGwRHKYkhhb4EyJ9 
=zvNW 
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
BQ_END

BQ_END

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zetalliance.org/pipermail/users_lists.zetalliance.org/attachments/20171013/911520ad/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RelNet_Logo_300x60.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11090 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.zetalliance.org/pipermail/users_lists.zetalliance.org/attachments/20171013/911520ad/attachment.png>