[Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release - Seems to break FOSS only servers

L Mark Stone lmstone at lmstone.com
Mon Apr 16 20:46:58 CEST 2018


I'll take a contrarian view and say that if a Zimbra server can't have unattended upgrades running with the Zimbra repos enabled, then that would be IMHO a very serious issue that Zimbra should address promptly.


The whole goal from Zimbra moving to their own repos as I understood it was to make Zimbra servers more secure and easy to maintain/upgrade for sys admins, and to lower Zimbra's support costs by reducing the number of configuration permutations they could expect to see in the field.


Certainly Zimbra are just getting experience at maintaining things like package dependencies so they need to do better for sure,  but Microsoft long ago moved away from allowing users to cherry pick fixes/patches to simplify support and ensure systems were more uniformly provisioned.  Sys Admins were happier and Microsoft's support costs were reduced.


I think it's the right direction, so, no, I'm not undoing repos nor unattended upgrades.


Best regards to all,

Mark

_________________________________________________

Another Message From...   L. Mark Stone


See my LinkedIn Profile<https://www.linkedin.com/in/lmarkstone>


________________________________
From: Frédéric Nass <frederic.nass at univ-lorraine.fr>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 9:41:49 AM
To: Barry de Graaff
Cc: L Mark Stone; Tony Publiski; users at lists.zetalliance.org; Phil Pearl
Subject: Re: [Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release - Seems to break FOSS only servers



Le 16/04/2018 à 15:38, Barry de Graaff a écrit :
Those are crystal ball questions to me.

I think it may be wise to disable all zimbra repos, to avoid issues if you are using yum-cron or unattended-upgrades.

Or in case someone installs OS upgrades, unaware of the zimbra situation. For most sysadmins, the expected behavior may not be what zimbra does.

I see we share the same habits. :-D

Frédéric.

On 16 Apr 2018, at 15:34, Frédéric Nass <frederic.nass at univ-lorraine.fr<mailto:frederic.nass at univ-lorraine.fr>> wrote:



Le 16/04/2018 à 15:26, Barry de Graaff a écrit :
The upgrade to 8.8.8 is done with a tgz.

The only new thing is the deployment of the patch via a repo.

Thank you Barry for the explanation. Do you have any idea if any of those are right :

- Minor updates won't ever come from  repos. Only patches will from repo "zimbra-888-patch". So downloading tarballs will always be required for minor updates.
- Minor updates will come from repo "zimbra" and patches from repo "zimbra-888-patch". So downloading tarballs will only be required on initial ZCS installation.

By the way, there's another "zimbra-v1" with no packages on it. This also is a mystery to me.

Frédéric.

I wonder why the decision has been made to have separate repos though.

In addition, the patch requires some parts of Zimbra restarted.

So all in all, still some manual work, why not use one repo per mayor release and then allow yum-cron to do the rest?



On 16 Apr 2018, at 15:17, Frédéric Nass <frederic.nass at univ-lorraine.fr<mailto:frederic.nass at univ-lorraine.fr>> wrote:


Hi Mark,


Same here. I would expect the zimbra-patch package to be updated along with other packages so that it gets applied / reapplied when updates come out. I don't know.


I'm still in the process of figuring out how minor updates should be applied, from the repos or by downloading the tarball and running ./install.sh as before.

I thought that minor updates would not come from the repos but apparently not. I'm running ZCS 8.8.7 on a test VM and a yum update shows absolutely _no_ ZCS 8.8.8 updates. :-/


This is so obscure.


Regards,


Frédéric.

Le 14/04/2018 à 13:15, L Mark Stone a écrit :

OK, I am so confused...


On one Zimbra system I have automatic updates configured, so the system upgraded, from the repos, various zimbra packages including  zimbra-chat zimbra-mbox-webclient-war zimbra-network-modules-ng


After that update completed I then installed the patch.


On another Zimbra system, I ran apt-get update; apt-get install zimbra-patch as per the release notes.  The patch installed fine, but if I run apt-get update AFTER the patch was installed, those three zimbra packages are still available for updating.


So I have two questions.


First, as the updated Zimbra packages were released on the same day/time as the patch, I'm assuming they are connected somehow.  If so, the what's the correct installation order?  Install the packages updates first, then the patch, or vica versa?


Second question is thinking ahead a few weeks.  Zimbra updates their repos, so an apt-get update; apt-get upgrade updates some Zimbra packages.  Do I now need to reinstall the patch?


Thanks,

Mark

_________________________________________________

Another Message From...   L. Mark Stone


See my LinkedIn Profile<https://www.linkedin.com/in/lmarkstone>


________________________________
From: Users <users-bounces at lists.zetalliance.org><mailto:users-bounces at lists.zetalliance.org> on behalf of Barry de Graaff <info at barrydegraaff.tk><mailto:info at barrydegraaff.tk>
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2018 3:42:54 AM
To: Tony Publiski
Cc: users at lists.zetalliance.org<mailto:users at lists.zetalliance.org>; Phil Pearl
Subject: Re: [Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release - Seems to break FOSS only servers

Yeah that works well, and it is also in the release notes... so my bad!

Kind regards,

Barry de Graaff
Zeta Alliance
Co-founder & Developer
zetalliance.org<http://zetalliance.org> | github.com/Zimbra-Community<http://github.com/Zimbra-Community>

+31 617 220 227 | skype: barrydegraaff.tk
Fingerprint: 97f4694a1d9aedad012533db725ddd156d36a2d0

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Publiski" <tonster at tonster.com><mailto:tonster at tonster.com>
To: "Barry en Katie de Graaff" <info at barrydegraaff.tk><mailto:info at barrydegraaff.tk>, "Malte S. Stretz" <mss at msquadrat.de><mailto:mss at msquadrat.de>
Cc: "Phil Pearl" <ppearl at zimbra.com><mailto:ppearl at zimbra.com>, users at lists.zetalliance.org<mailto:users at lists.zetalliance.org>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 7:36:54 PM
Subject: Re[3]: [Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release - Seems to break FOSS only servers

Hello again!

Here's the response I got from engineering toda:

I looked at installation steps. It looks like, they are using yum update
-y to install patch packages.

Instead, they should use below commands to install the patch:
yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=zimbra-888-patch clean metadata
yum check-update --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=zimbra-888-patch --noplugins
yum install zimbra-patch

Let me know if this helps!

Tony

------ Original Message ------
From: "Tony Publiski" <tonster at tonster.com><mailto:tonster at tonster.com>
To: "Barry de Graaff" <info at barrydegraaff.tk><mailto:info at barrydegraaff.tk>; "Malte S. Stretz"
<mss at msquadrat.de><mailto:mss at msquadrat.de>
Cc: "Phil Pearl" <ppearl at zimbra.com><mailto:ppearl at zimbra.com>; users at lists.zetalliance.org<mailto:users at lists.zetalliance.org>
Sent: 4/13/2018 9:53:01 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release - Seems to break
FOSS only servers

>Hi Barry,
>
>Nice find. I'll take a look and see what engineering has to say.
>
>Tony
>
>------ Original Message ------
>From: "Barry de Graaff" <info at barrydegraaff.tk><mailto:info at barrydegraaff.tk>
>To: "Malte S. Stretz" <mss at msquadrat.de><mailto:mss at msquadrat.de>
>Cc: "Tony Publiski" <tonster at tonster.com><mailto:tonster at tonster.com>; "Phil Pearl"
><ppearl at zimbra.com><mailto:ppearl at zimbra.com>; users at lists.zetalliance.org<mailto:users at lists.zetalliance.org>
>Sent: 4/13/2018 4:41:18 AM
>Subject: Re: [Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release - Seems to break FOSS
>only servers
>
>>No this was always FOSS only, not Zextras no Talk none of that.
>>
>>Kind regards,
>>
>>Barry de Graaff
>>Zeta Alliance
>>Co-founder & Developer
>>zetalliance.org<http://zetalliance.org> | github.com/Zimbra-Community<http://github.com/Zimbra-Community>
>>
>>+31 617 220 227 | skype: barrydegraaff.tk
>>Fingerprint: 97f4694a1d9aedad012533db725ddd156d36a2d0
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Malte S. Stretz" <mss at msquadrat.de><mailto:mss at msquadrat.de>
>>To: "Barry en Katie de Graaff" <info at barrydegraaff.tk><mailto:info at barrydegraaff.tk>
>>Cc: "Tony Publiski" <tonster at tonster.com><mailto:tonster at tonster.com>, "Phil Pearl"
>><ppearl at zimbra.com><mailto:ppearl at zimbra.com>, users at lists.zetalliance.org<mailto:users at lists.zetalliance.org>
>>Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 10:35:12 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release - Seems to break
>>FOSS only servers
>>
>>Hi Barry,
>>
>>
>>I always have trouble reading the dependency output of yum but to me
>>it
>>looks like zimbra-network-modules-ng is pulled in by zimbra-talk.
>>Which
>>isn't supported for FOSS and shouldn't appear in the dependency tree
>>at
>>all. Especially both zimbra-chat and zimbra-talk shouldn't appear at
>>the
>>same time.
>>
>>
>>Did you by any chance downgrade this system from NE to FOSS at
>>somepoint? Since this sounds a bit like the issue I had with such a
>>downgrade on Ubuntu and for which I filed
>>https://bugzilla.zimbra.com/show_bug.cgi?id=108911
>>
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Malte
>>
>>
>>
>>On 13.04.2018 09:13, Barry de Graaff wrote:
>>>Hello Tony and Phil,
>>>
>>>It seems the patch 8.8.8 p1 is distributed via the repos.
>>>
>>>It does NOT seem to work if one runs a FOSS only server (aka without
>>>Zextras).
>>>
>>>I am addressing Phil as there is a CVE 5.8 Major security fix in the
>>>patch.
>>>
>>>[root at zimbra1 ~]# yum update -y
>>>Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
>>>Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
>>>* base: centos.mirror.triple-it.nl<http://centos.mirror.triple-it.nl>
>>>* epel: mirror.1000mbps.com<http://mirror.1000mbps.com>
>>>* extras: mirror.denit.net<http://mirror.denit.net>
>>>* updates: mirror.prolocation.net<http://mirror.prolocation.net>
>>>Resolving Dependencies
>>>--> Running transaction check
>>>---> Package zimbra-chat.x86_64 0:1.0.13.1521626727-2.r7 will be
>>>obsoleted
>>>---> Package zimbra-common-core-jar.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7
>>>will be updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-common-core-jar.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>will be an update
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-conf.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7 will be
>>>updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-conf.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7 will be
>>>an update
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-service.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7 will
>>>be updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-service.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7 will
>>>be an update
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7 will be
>>>updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7 will be
>>>an
>>>update
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-webclient-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521723166-1.r7
>>>will be updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-webclient-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1523095946-1.r7
>>>will be an update
>>>---> Package zimbra-talk.x86_64 0:1.0.3.1523266296-1.r7 will be
>>>obsoleting
>>>--> Processing Dependency: zimbra-network-modules-ng >= 1.0.14 for
>>>package: zimbra-talk-1.0.3.1523266296-1.r7.x86_64
>>>--> Running transaction check
>>>---> Package zimbra-network-modules-ng.x86_64
>>>0:1.0.14.1522918190-1.r7
>>>will be installed
>>>--> Processing Dependency: zimbra-network-store >= 8.8.8 for package:
>>>zimbra-network-modules-ng-1.0.14.1522918190-1.r7.x86_64
>>>--> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>>*Error: Package:
>>>zimbra-network-modules-ng-1.0.14.1522918190-1.r7.x86_64
>>>(zimbra-888-patch)*
>>>*           Requires: zimbra-network-store >= 8.8.8*
>>>You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>>>You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>>>
>>>[root at zimbra1 ~]# su zimbra
>>>[zimbra at zimbra1 root]$ zmcontrol -v
>>>Release 8.8.8_GA_2009.RHEL7_64_20180322150747 RHEL7_64 FOSS edition.
>>>
>>>This is a FOSS only server, and should not fetch
>>>*zimbra-network-modules-ng.*
>>>
>>>
>>>Funny thing is, that on a FOSS server with Zextras installed, it does
>>>work:
>>>[root at mail ~]# yum update -y
>>>Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
>>>Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
>>>* base: mirrors.centos.webair.com<http://mirrors.centos.webair.com>
>>>* epel: mirror.math.princeton.edu<http://mirror.math.princeton.edu>
>>>* extras: mirrors.centos.webair.com<http://mirrors.centos.webair.com>
>>>* updates: mirrors.tripadvisor.com<http://mirrors.tripadvisor.com>
>>>Resolving Dependencies
>>>--> Running transaction check
>>>---> Package zimbra-common-core-jar.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7
>>>will be updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-common-core-jar.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>will be an update
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-conf.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7 will be
>>>updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-conf.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7 will be
>>>an update
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-service.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7 will
>>>be updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-service.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7 will
>>>be an update
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7 will be
>>>updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7 will be
>>>an
>>>update
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-webclient-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1521723166-1.r7
>>>will be updated
>>>---> Package zimbra-mbox-webclient-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1523095946-1.r7
>>>will be an update
>>>--> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>>
>>>Dependencies Resolved
>>>
>>>================================================================================
>>>Package                   Arch   Version     Repository        Size
>>>================================================================================
>>>Updating:
>>>zimbra-common-core-jar    x86_64 1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>zimbra-888-patch  13 M
>>>zimbra-mbox-conf          x86_64 1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>zimbra-888-patch  35 k
>>>zimbra-mbox-service       x86_64 1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>zimbra-888-patch 3.7 k
>>>zimbra-mbox-war           x86_64 1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>zimbra-888-patch  21 M
>>>zimbra-mbox-webclient-war x86_64 1.0.0.1523095946-1.r7
>>>zimbra-888-patch  24 M
>>>
>>>Transaction Summary
>>>================================================================================
>>>Upgrade  5 Packages
>>>
>>>Total download size: 59 M
>>>Downloading packages:
>>>Delta RPMs disabled because /usr/bin/applydeltarpm not installed.
>>>(1/5): zimbra-mbox-conf-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64.rpm   |  35 kB
>>>00:00
>>>(2/5): zimbra-mbox-service-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64.rp | 3.7 kB
>>>00:00
>>>(3/5): zimbra-common-core-jar-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64 |  13 MB
>>>00:01
>>>(4/5): zimbra-mbox-war-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64.rpm    |  21 MB
>>>00:02
>>>(5/5): zimbra-mbox-webclient-war-1.0.0.1523095946-1.r7.x86 |  24 MB
>>>00:02
>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>Total  13 MB/s |  59 MB  00:04
>>>Running transaction check
>>>Running transaction test
>>>Transaction test succeeded
>>>Running transaction
>>>Warning: RPMDB altered outside of yum.
>>>  Updating   : zimbra-common-core-jar-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64
>>>1/10
>>>  Updating   : zimbra-mbox-war-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64   2/10
>>>  Updating   : zimbra-mbox-conf-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64  3/10
>>>  Updating   : zimbra-mbox-service-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64   4/10
>>>  Updating   : zimbra-mbox-webclient-war-1.0.0.1523095946-1.r7.x86_64
>>>  5/10
>>>  Cleanup    : zimbra-mbox-service-1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7.x86_64   6/10
>>>  Cleanup    : zimbra-mbox-war-1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7.x86_64   7/10
>>>  Cleanup    : zimbra-mbox-conf-1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7.x86_64  8/10
>>>  Cleanup    : zimbra-common-core-jar-1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7.x86_64
>>>9/10
>>>  Cleanup    : zimbra-mbox-webclient-war-1.0.0.1521723166-1.r7.x86_64
>>>10/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-mbox-conf-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64  1/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-mbox-war-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64   2/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-mbox-service-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64   3/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-mbox-webclient-war-1.0.0.1523095946-1.r7.x86_64
>>>  4/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-common-core-jar-1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7.x86_64
>>>5/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-mbox-webclient-war-1.0.0.1521723166-1.r7.x86_64
>>>  6/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-mbox-war-1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7.x86_64   7/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-mbox-service-1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7.x86_64   8/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-common-core-jar-1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7.x86_64
>>>9/10
>>>  Verifying  : zimbra-mbox-conf-1.0.0.1521707697-1.r7.x86_64 10/10
>>>
>>>Updated:
>>>  zimbra-common-core-jar.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>  zimbra-mbox-conf.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>  zimbra-mbox-service.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>  zimbra-mbox-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1522952748-1.r7
>>>  zimbra-mbox-webclient-war.x86_64 0:1.0.0.1523095946-1.r7
>>>
>>>Complete!
>>>[root at mail ~]# su zimbra
>>>[zimbra at mail root]$ zmcontrol restart
>>>
>>>Good thing it's Friday!
>>>
>>>Kind regards,
>>>
>>>Barry de Graaff
>>>Zeta Alliance
>>>Co-founder & Developer
>>>zetalliance.org<http://zetalliance.org> | github.com/Zimbra-Community<http://github.com/Zimbra-Community>
>>>
>>>+31 617 220 227 | skype: barrydegraaff.tk
>>>Fingerprint: 97f4694a1d9aedad012533db725ddd156d36a2d0
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>*From: *"L Mark Stone" <lmstone at lmstone.com><mailto:lmstone at lmstone.com>
>>>*To: *"Randy Leiker" <randy at skywaynetworks.com><mailto:randy at skywaynetworks.com>,
>>>users at lists.zetalliance.org<mailto:users at lists.zetalliance.org>, "Tony Publiski" <tonster at tonster.com><mailto:tonster at tonster.com>
>>>*Sent: *Friday, April 13, 2018 2:03:48 AM
>>>*Subject: *Re: [Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release
>>>
>>>On a single Zimbra 8.8.8 server, a number of the Zimbra packages
>>>today
>>>were given updates that I installed prior to installing the patch,
>>>FWIW.
>>>
>>>
>>>Not sure how/if they are connected?
>>>
>>>
>>>    Start-Date: 2018-04-1218:40:46
>>>
>>>    Commandline: apt-get dist-upgrade
>>>
>>>    Upgrade: zimbra-mbox-service:amd64 (1.0.0.1521707697-1.u16,
>>>    1.0.0.1522952748-1.u16), plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text:amd64
>>>    (0.9.2-3ubuntu13.3, 0.9.2-3ubuntu13.4), zimbra-mbox-conf:amd64
>>>    (1.0.0.1521707697-1.u16, 1.0.0.1522952748-1.u16),
>>>    libplymouth4:amd64 (0.9.2-3ubuntu13.3, 0.9.2-3ubuntu13.4),
>>>    apport:amd64 (2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15, 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.16),
>>>    zimbra-talk:amd64 (1.0.2.1521642559-1.u16,
>>>    1.0.3.1523266296-1.u16), python3-apport:amd64 (2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15,
>>>    2.20.1-0ubuntu2.16), zimbra-mbox-war:amd64
>>>    (1.0.0.1521707697-1.u16, 1.0.0.1522952748-1.u16), plymouth:amd64
>>>    (0.9.2-3ubuntu13.3, 0.9.2-3ubuntu13.4),
>>>    zimbra-common-core-jar:amd64 (1.0.0.1521707697-1.u16,
>>>    1.0.0.1522952748-1.u16), zimbra-network-modules-ng:amd64
>>>    (1.0.13+1521603981-1.u16, 1.0.14.1522918190-1.u16),
>>>    python3-problem-report:amd64 (2.20.1-0ubuntu2.15,
>>>    2.20.1-0ubuntu2.16), zimbra-mbox-webclient-war:amd64
>>>    (1.0.0.1521723166-1.u16, 1.0.0.1523095946-1.u16)
>>>
>>>    End-Date: 2018-04-1218:41:17
>>>
>>>
>>>    Start-Date: 2018-04-1218:44:25
>>>
>>>    Commandline: apt-get install zimbra-patch
>>>
>>>    Install: zimbra-patch:amd64 (8.8.8.1.1522961836-1.u16)
>>>
>>>    End-Date: 2018-04-1218:44:32
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>*_________________________________________________*
>>>
>>>*Another Message From...   L. Mark Stone*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>*From:* Users <users-bounces at lists.zetalliance.org><mailto:users-bounces at lists.zetalliance.org> on behalf of Tony
>>>Publiski <tonster at tonster.com><mailto:tonster at tonster.com>
>>>*Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2018 7:09 PM
>>>*To:* Randy Leiker; users at lists.zetalliance.org<mailto:users at lists.zetalliance.org>
>>>*Subject:* Re: [Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release
>>>I haven't actually looked at what's fixed in this patch, however
>>>*most* of the time you don't need to ever patch anything but the
>>>store
>>>server, so really I wouldn't even both with the other nodes. Yes, the
>>>zimbra-common-core-jar package is used by zmprov, and thus exists on
>>>all nodes, however it's almost certain that nothing patched affects
>>>the non-mailbox server nodes. The former patch would, of course, run
>>>on all nodes, but only actually copied files based on what services
>>>were installed, and I can't remember a patch I was involved in
>>>actually patching anything on non-store nodes.
>>>
>>>Tony
>>>
>>>------ Original Message ------
>>>From: "Randy Leiker" <randy at skywaynetworks.com<mailto:randy at skywaynetworks.com>
>>><mailto:randy at skywaynetworks.com>>
>>>To: users at lists.zetalliance.org<mailto:users at lists.zetalliance.org> <mailto:users at lists.zetalliance.org>
>>>Sent: 4/12/2018 7:03:31 PM
>>>Subject: [Users] Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 release
>>>
>>>    Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>>    Today Zimbra 8.8.8 Patch 1 was released as GA:
>>>https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/8.8.8/P1
>>>
>>>    One of the bug fixes included (35115) helps with the Zimbra High
>>>    Availability open source project I've been working on developing.
>>>     I'll be publishing the initial reference designs for that project
>>>    very soon on its own web site.  In the meantime, I deployed 8.8.8
>>>    patch 1 to begin testing in my lab environment which is running
>>>    CentOS 7, with ZCS 8.8.8.  The install instructions as written in
>>>    the release notes for Red Hat/CentOS servers
>>>
>>>(https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/8.8.8/P1#Install_the_Patch)
>>>    work fine if you're running a single server install of ZCS.  But,
>>>    if you're running a multi-node install of ZCS, the patch install
>>>    instructions in the release notes are inaccurate.
>>>
>>>    In my lab environment, I have the following ZCS nodes provisioned:
>>>
>>>      * 2 x LDAP MMR nodes
>>>      * 2 x MTA nodes
>>>      * 2 x Proxy nodes
>>>      * 2 x Mailbox nodes
>>>
>>>    If you attempt to follow the install instructions for the patch
>>>    with a similar ZCS multi-node environment as noted above, you'll
>>>    see a dependency failure in Yum that will prevent the patch from
>>>    installing:
>>>
>>>    Error: Package: zimbra-patch-8.8.8.1.1522961836-1.r7.x86_64
>>>    (zimbra-888-patch)
>>>               Requires: zimbra-store >= 8.8.8
>>>     You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>>>     You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>>>
>>>    This occurs because the zimbra-store package isn't installed on
>>>    all of the ZCS nodes.  Instead, what you'll need to do is on your
>>>    LDAP, MTA, and Proxy nodes, or essentially any ZCS node where the
>>>    zimbra-store package is NOT installed, simply run these commands:
>>>
>>>      * As the root user:
>>>          o yum upgrade (upgrades the zimbra-common-core-jar package)
>>>      * As the zimbra user:
>>>          o zmcontrol restart
>>>
>>>    Then, on your ZCS mailbox nodes (where the zimbra-store package is
>>>    installed), follow the install instructions as written in the
>>>    8.8.8 Patch 1 release notes.
>>>
>>>    When you get to the section in the release notes that advises
>>>running:
>>>
>>>      * yum install zimbra-network-modules-ng
>>>      * yum install zimbra-chat  OR    yum install zimbra-talk
>>>
>>>    If you've already upgraded to 8.8.8, which would of course be the
>>>    case if you're trying to install patch 1, the 8.8.8 install
>>>    process uninstalls the zimbra-chat package & replaces it with
>>>    zimbra-talk, so you only need to run:
>>>
>>>      * As the root user:
>>>          o yum install zimbra-network-modules-ng
>>>          o yum install zimbra-talk
>>>      * As the zimbra user:
>>>          o zmmailboxdctl restart
>>>
>>>    Otherwise, all of the ZCS services appeared to start successfully
>>>    following the install of Patch 1. I wasn't able to test it within
>>>    my Zimbra lab environment, but I suspect the Ubuntu install
>>>    instructions in the release notes need a similar clarification for
>>>    multi-node ZCS installs.
>>>
>>>
>>>    Randy Leiker (randy at skywaynetworks.com<mailto:randy at skywaynetworks.com>
>>>    <mailto:randy at skywaynetworks.com> )
>>>    Skyway Networks, LLC
>>>    1.800.538.5334 / 913.663.3900 Ext. 100
>>>https://www.skywaynetworks.com <http://www.skywaynetworks.com>
>>>
>>>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zetalliance.org/pipermail/users_lists.zetalliance.org/attachments/20180416/7473d850/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list