[Users] Zimbra mailbox project

Barry de Graaff info at barrydegraaff.tk
Thu Jan 18 15:06:20 CET 2018


zmmailbox is in FOSS.

zmmboxmove is NOT.


Kind regards, 

Barry de Graaff
Zeta Alliance 
Co-founder & Developer
zetalliance.org | github.com/Zimbra-Community

+31 617 220 227 | skype: barrydegraaff.tk
Fingerprint: 97f4694a1d9aedad012533db725ddd156d36a2d0

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Gadsdon" <mg at in-tuition.net>
To: users at lists.zetalliance.org
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 2:52:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] Zimbra mailbox project

> In the email announcing the project yesterday, I didn't
> elaborate much on the methods being evaluated for evacuating end user mailboxes
> from a mailbox node, but two that I'm looking at now, for automation with
> scripting, are both zmmboxmove & zmmailbox. They both use differing methods,
> where the former seems to use a rsync-like method, and the latter uses an
> export/import method. Since the intent of the project is to use existing admin
> functionality within Zimbra, along with additional helper open source utilities
> where appropriate, I don't yet know which of these offers the best match & to
> what degree these utilities remain functional when a mailbox node goes bad. I
> think this question can only be answered through additional testing.

Hi Randy,

Is zmmailbox available in FOSS - I'm unfamiliar with FOSS, so don't know. You also need to be aware of this bug https://bugzilla.zimbra.com/show_bug.cgi?id=101760 which is pretty nasty and, I think, renders zmmailbox exports unreliable.  I was just thinking that it might be that you'll be forced to leverage Network Edition features to make this project viable and in which case, you might consider the Zextras modules - in particular the migration component which may offer you more options and better performance.

Cheers,

Marc




More information about the Users mailing list